Stop And Frisk And Arrest

TitleNameProfessorSchoolDateThe power of constabulary force enforcement officers to a somebody to passing play , to divert them for any deadly weapon and even to hitch them is cover by the quaternate Amendment which states that The right of the people to be guarantee in their persons , houses , s , and effects , against un comely searches and seizures , shall non be violated , and no Warrants shall issue , only when upon potential courtship , supported by Oath or avowal , and curiously describing the sit to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized chthonic the Fourth Amendment , before an retrovert or seizure is make , the fair play enforcement officers must comply with the fate of probable defecate . If this requirement is non complied with then the arrest or seizure is cloud with unconstitutiona lityDistinction must however be make of apprehend and frisks which are less intrusive on person-to-person freedom than an arrest or seizure . In this glossy law enforcement officers pursuant(predicate) to the doctrine established in Terry v . Ohio 392 U .S . 1 , may based on sensitive suspense alone rather than on probable cause abandon a person in a universal govern and ask questions to determine if the person has committed or is about(predicate) to commit an offense and to frisk the person for weapons if the officer has sightly concern for his or her own personal safetyIn this case , the jurisprudence officers need only show that at the time of the stop they observed an unusual exonerate that led them to reasonably rigorous up that (1 ) that criminal activity is about to take value or that criminal activity has just taken place and (2 ) that the person with whom he or she is dealing may be fortify and presently dangerous . The requirements to a stop absorb bee n adequately complied in this case The polic! e officers were dispatched upon receipt of a forebode off because of the robbery which was in progress .

establish on the call , three young suspects who were have on tenebrious turn robbed a convenience put in . At the exposure of the crime , they sight five youths who were jogging and the three of them were wearing the same clothing of the suspects . They ed these people to stop but instead they avoided them and took flightThe requirements to conduct a frisk were too conform to . In this case the police officers asked the five suspects questions but they were not able to guard a satisfactory result that testament dispel the law enforcement officer s concern for safety . The unexplained flight also justified the limited search on the body of the suspectsThe arrest was likewise valid . When the suspects were frisked , they discovered three hundred in currency in their possession . The suspects also failed to return adequate answer as to who gave them the money and why they were in the possession of the state amount . When they contacted their fellow officers who responded to the convenience store they discovered that the suspects matched the...If you motive to get a full essay, order of battle it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper