.

Friday, February 15, 2019

Embryonic Stem Cell Research :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

Americans are asked by the media to actualize immature fundament cell research (ESCR) that uses piece embryos. Many Americans favor ESCR because of the potential for benefiting hatful in need, people racked by disease. This essay goes beyond the emotional get outs meet ESCR and informs the reader of the scientific background so that he is capable of devising a well-informed decision about ESCR. In August of populate year, President Bush approved the use of federal funds to support research on a limited number of existing human embryonic stem cell lines (Bush). The decision met with notably mixed reactions. Proponents of embryonic stem cell research argue that restricting federal reenforcement to a limited number of cell lines will hamper the work out of science, while those impertinent insist that any use of cells derived from human embryos constitutes a significant breach of moral principles. It is clear that pressure to expand the limits established by the President will continue. It is equally clear that the ethical positions of those opposed to this research are unlikely to change. Regrettably, much of the debate on this issue has taken place on emotional grounds, pitting the hope of solidifying heartrending medical conditions against the deeply held moral convictions of many Americans. Such arguments frequently ignore or mischaracterize the scientific facts. To arrive at an informed judicial decision on human embryonic stem cell research, it is important to view a clear understanding of precisely what embryonic stem cells are, whether embryonic stem cells are likely to be useful for medical treatments, and whether in that respect are viable alternatives to the use of embryonic stem cells in scientific research. Embryonic development is one of the most fascinating of all biological processes. A newly fertilized egg faces the daunting challenge of not only when generating all of the tissues of the mature animal but organizing them i nto a functionally integrated whole. Generating a wide range of heavy(a) cell types is not an power unique to embryos. Certain types of tumors called teratomas are extraordinarily adept at generating adult tissues, but unlike embryos, they do so without the benefit of an organizing principle or blueprint. Such tumors rapidly produce skin, bone, muscle, and even hair and teeth, all massed unitedly in a chaotic lump of tissue. Many of the signals required to hurry formation of specialized adult cells must be present in these tumors, but unlike embryos, tumors generate adult cell types in a hopelessly undirected manner.

No comments:

Post a Comment