The Decisions to Bomb the Serbs :: essays research papers

THE DECISION TO BOMB THE SERBSThe Decision to Bomb the Serbs was a genuinely interesting case film. It was hard for me to choose a case study but after reading my top three choices I in the end came to a conclusion. I never knew about this particular topic, but as I read I was impressed with it, which brought this question to my mind.Should the US grant intervened to prevent or end violations of human rights in Kosovo, when these violations did non at present affect other American interests? This was one of the many questions that I and the American public asked themselves, their congressmen and ultimately, their government, during the chaos in the Middle East. It must have been a difficult task to decide whether or not to take litigate against Milosevic in Belgrade. In this case there are many cardinal concepts that shape the way in which the events that led to the bombing of Kosovo played out. I will attempt, in this paper, to discuss the different themes that played a de sign in this case study.It was thought that the Kosovo crisis came at a time when the professorship of the United States was most distracted, and could easily have made the wrong decisions. base on the severity of the situation in Kosovo, one would need to focalize on the negotiations necessary to find peace. The Clinton Administrations primary guidance was on the pending impeachment of their leader. The case against President Bill Clinton required his undivided economic aid, as it pertained to his promiscuous actions while in office. The lack of personal attention to this crisis as it developed, may have been the triggering factor that led to many deaths and convulsive acts of crime that took place in Kosovo.The decision to bomb was one that could not follow the rational method of decision making, even though the goals, alternatives and government issues were known. The US government knew what the primary goal was pertaining to Kosovo, they needed to negotiated or come to roughly form of middle ground with Milosevic, allowing for peace. They had alternatives to the negotiation process, which was to take military action. The consequence of taking these actions would be the repercussions of the bombings. Even with all this known, it would still be infeasible to follow the rational decision-making model as defined by Charles Lindbolm. However, a more appropriate method would be the Branch Method.